Item 2420 - Confronting the evidence

Video

The official explanation for 9/11 is that Al Qaeda just got lucky that sunny morning in September 2001. The terrorists conducted their attacks without outside help, by this account, and intelligence and other blunders by the US authorities that contributed to their terrible success - for example, ignored warnings that an attack involving aeroplanes was likely, or issuing US entry visas to 19 Islamic fanatics set on murder - were just that: blunders. This is the White House's version and it was endorsed by a Washington commission of inquiry under Thomas Kean published last year. But, according to Henshall and Morgan, the story is full of gaping holes and unanswered questions. And the most startling question, which remains unresolved, they say, is why the hijackers' principal target, the two 110-storey towers at the World Trade Centre in New York crumbled so easily. No-one who watched each building suddenly cascade into dust and debris in just 20 seconds will ever forget the slow-motion horror. But now the question is asked: was it all too pat, too neat? Though 30 years old, the towers had expressly been built to survive the impact of a Boeing 707, a plane the same size and carrying as much fuel as the ones that struck. That they collapsed after being hit and fell at such speed was unprecedented in the history of architecture....

Press: No; Catalogue: No; Itinerancies: No; Online archive: No; Television: No

sinopsi copiada de http://www.videomediaonline.com/911therealtruth.html?gclid=CPCFjKqS6ooCFSV1XgodHUnvlg

• Catalan

• Latin